Difteria: cómo sacarse de la manga un brote.

Las presstitutas nos dan los buenos dias hoy con este “notición”:

Detectada la bacteria de difteria en 8 niños cercanos al contagiado de Girona | EL PAIS

“Hemos hecho frotis en 57 niños cercanos al contagiado, y la bacteria está en ocho … “no han desarrollado la enfermedad gracias a que están vacunados.”

Estos médicos saben que la vacuna solo contrarresta la toxina y no ataca a la bacteria. Saben que la vacuna no impide la circulación de Corynebacterium diphtheriae entre la población. Saben que la incidencia subclínica es relativamente alta:

Prevalence of diphtheria carriers in a population with disappearing clinical diphtheria.

“…Among 895 school children (6-13 years-old) in seven primary schools of different socioeconomic levels, only seven were carriers of non-toxigenic C. diphtheriae strains, corresponding to a prevalence of 0.8%. Toxigenic strains were not found.”

Lo han de saber porque tienen títulos de Medicina, sin embargo parece que acaban de descubrir América.

¿Por qué no informan de la incidencia subclínica de C. diphteriae en la población en general de Cataluña?

Sin saber la incidencia normal es imposible valorar el significado de esos 8 portadores. No han buscado la bacteria fuera del entorno del crío afectado (sesgo de selección). Convenientemente, se han “olvidado” de usar la población en general como control de referencia.

¿Estamos ante una situacion especial o es la incidencia subclínica normal? No les interesa averiguarlo, quieren alarmar y mentalizar, no decir la verdad y tranquilzar.

Me niego a creer que sean tan incompetentes. Este sesgo tan burdo tiene la misión de crear la falsa impresión de un “brote” y de que la gente lo atribuya a los niños sin vacunar.

Una vez más: Miserables!

P.S.: Les están dando antibióticos a pesar de que “no han desarrollado la enfermedad”. Estos incompetentes van a acabar creando una cepa resistente, lo que nos faltaba ya.

La solidaridad con los pro-vacunas se paga con traición.

Los partidarios de la vacunación suelen acusarnos de insolidaridad a quienes optamos por no vacunar.

Según ellos nos aprovechamos de la “inmunidad de grupo” conseguida gracias que sus hijos están “protegidos” (que los padres no tengan al dia sus dosis adultas de recuerdo es otro tema). Se nos presentan como ciudadanos modelo cuyas manos no tiemblan en sacrificar a sus hijos por el “bien común”. Nosotros seríamos seres ignorantes y egoistas que parasitamos de la salud colectiva.

Buscan crear un sentimiento de culpabilidad.

Vale que esta gente desconozca los riesgos que asumen, pero es que tampoco son conscientes de la actitud de autoridades y jueces cuando dichos riesgos se materializan y alguien resulta seriamente dañado por las vacunas.

Veamos algunos casos ejemplarizantes:

Así colabora la Unidad de Farmacovigilancia de la Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios (Aemps) con las familias de niños afectados por vacunas.

El hijo de Federico Sánchez-Apellániz murió al padecer una encefalopatía tras recibir todas las vacunas recomendadas. Federico quiere saber, entre otras cosas, el contenido exacto de la vacuna sospechosa de causar la Encefalopatía Motora progresiva postnatal precoz y Mioclonias de origen córtico-subcortical a su vástago.

Actuamos como nos dijeron, que fuéramos padres responsables y vacunáramos a nuestro niño con las dosis recomendadas en el calendario de vacunas de Andalucía.

La Unidad de Farmacovigilancia de la Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios (Aemps) se niega a solicitar una muestra del mismo lote al laboratorio fabricante de la vacuna, el cual está obligado a mantener muestras de lotes de vacunas durante un periodo determinado.

En la Agencia se extrañan de que sea “la primera vez que un ciudadano nos solicita dichas muestras”.

Directora-AEMPS

Belén Crespo, directora de la Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios.

Esta persona quiere averiguar cómo ha actuado en el cuerpo del niño esa vacuna. Su hijo nació y creció sano durante los primeros meses de su vida pero le pusieron muchas dosis de vacunas (todas las del calendario vacunal recomendado y algunas más que recomendaron por su cuenta los pediatras que le atendieron).

¿Por qué el ciudadano no puede disponer de estas muestras de la vacuna para analizar su toxicidad? Farmacovigilancia nos pide que tengamos confianza en el sistema. Lo cierto es que viendo cómo actúan en casos como este en el que parecen más preocupados por defender a los laboratorios que a las personas o lo ocurrido durante el escándalo Agreal, no es fácil mantener esa confianza. La Agencia que dirige Belén Crespo no puede mirar para otro lado pues tiene como objetivo servir a la ciudadanía.

Varios especialistas solicitan analizar dicho lote para poder realizar un diagnóstico adecuado. Esa información es crucial para enfocar una terapia lo más personalizada posible que ayude a recuperar su salud. La respuesta de la Agencia cuya obligación es proporcionar la muestra es hacerse los locos.

¿Son los jueces mejores que estos politicastros vendidos a las farmacéuticas? Los testimonios no dejan lugar a mucha esperanza, leamos:

Sandra
6 de noviembre de 2013

http://www.migueljara.com/

“Tengo un niño de siete años con el mismo problema, encefalitis post vacunal, llevado a juicio demostrando cada ingreso y la ausencia de cualquier enfermedad previa o congénita, la sentencia de vergüenza… han echado balones fuera desestimando valorar el efecto de la vacunación, después de dos años, alegando que no se le ha vacunado en la seguridad social teniendo la cartilla de vacunación sellada por la seguridad social y los partes correspondientes de consulta.

Lo que quiero decir es que lamentablemente luchamos contra gigantes y contra muchos intereses. Solo quería decir que esto ha pasado, pasa y seguirá pasando y nadie se hace responsable.”

El sufrimiento de estos padres se agrava por su dilema ético, pues el niño estaba sano y muere o se enferma como consecuencia directa de una decisión suya. No es lo mismo que “te toque” una enfermedad.

Las llamadas a la solidaridad de los vacuneros no están respaldadas por solidaridad recíproca cuando sus recomendaciones acarrean consecuencias graves. La recompensa del sistema para quienes sacrifican a su ser más querido por el “bien común” es de cruel indiferencia a menudo acompañada de injurias.

Quien preste oidos a sus cantos de sirena, debe saber que si algo sale mal le dejarán tirado, abandonado a su suerte como una cucaracha. No solo eso, además le acusarán de mentir. Su prioridad es es mantener el mito de que “las vacunas no dañan” caigan tus hijos o caiga quien caiga.

La vacuna se ha cargado la inmunidad natural contral a difteria.

Estudio en el Journal of Infectious Diseases: The Changing Epidemiology of Diphtheria in the Vaccine Era

Antes:

In 1914 in Vienna [16] and in 1923 in New York City [17], ∼80% of newborns showed evidence of diphtheria immunity (figure 1). During the first several months of life, this passive immunity waned and was gradually replaced by active immunity, which was acquired through increasing exposure to natural infection. By 15 years of age, 80% of the children had acquired natural immunity against diphtheria.

Después:

In areas where diphtheria has been controlled through immunization programs, the immune status of the population has changed considerably: Children have high levels of diphtheria immunity as a result of childhood immunization. The level of immunity declines in late childhood and adolescence… Without the periodic administration of booster doses of diphtheria toxoid or repeated exposure to toxigenic strains of C. diphtheriae, adults become susceptible to diphtheria. The likelihood of having protective antibody levels decreases with age, and in some industrialized countries, >50% of adults are susceptible to diphtheria

De una inmunidad de por vida adquirida a través de anticuerpos maternos y exposición subclínica pasamos tener un 50% de la población adulta expuesta a la difteria.

Luego cuando hay brotes esos mismos adultos que no se ponen las vacunas de refuerzo (boosters), y que por ello (según su propia fe) son portadores y transmisores, señalan con su dedo hipócrita y acusador a los padres que no vacunamos.

Talibanes de las vacunas, cumplan con los preceptos de su propia fe antes de echar babas sobre quienes no compartimos su fe religiosa.

El caso del bacalao … la difteria de Val d’Hebron.

La trama toma un cariz cade vez mas chusco y descarado. Ahora anuncian que los padres anónimos de la criatura anónima eran “homeópatas” (qué casualidad!), que han visto la luz y se “arrepienten” de no haber vacunado, y como guinda que se sienten “engañados” por los “grupos antivacunas”. Léanlo aquí.

Pleno al quince en la quiniela y de postre la Bonoloto!

Leyendo mas detenidamente vemos que son meras afirmaciones de la boca de un político, el secretario de Salud Pública, que “desinteresadamente” presta su voz a estos seres misteriosos resguardados del escrutinio público en las profundidades el hospital Vall d’Hebron.

A pesar de lo que diga el castuzo y la prensa controlada no hay información para saber a ciencia cierta qué pasa en realidad.

Me pregunto porqué estos padres – si es que existe tal familia y tienen un mensaje público que dar – necesitan que el encargado de las políticas vacunales les sirva de ventrílocuo. Es tan truculento y tan conveniente para sus intereses que apesta a kilómetros a guión preparado de antemano.

Esos “grupos antivacunassomos los padres que a título individual y como resultado de nuestras indagaciones consideramos que vacunar es una insensatez con riesgos inasumibles. El castuzo nos eleva a la categoría de grupo organizado con oscuros intereses y a un paso del terrorismo. Olé sus cojones, de verdad.

Este caso huele a puro montaje mediático tipo e-Bola y Gripe-nÁ.

Hay hijos de puta que utilizan este esperpento para anunciar “la reaparición de la difteria en España“. A esos hijos de puta decirles que una flor no hace primavera. Ninguna política que implique restricción de derechos fundamentales – ver propuestas de vacunación forzosa – debe basarse en casos excepcionales e histerias colectivas, precisamente el efecto que se persigue con este burdo montaje.

Me permito recordarles a todos los pro-vacunas que las autoridades sanitarias recomiendan dosis de recuerdo en adultos para la difteria porque se pierde la “protección” (así llaman a los anticuerpos de la vacuna). Cito:

(pág. 17) “Los estudios de seroprevalencia de anticuerpos frente a difteria realizados endiferentes países mostraban niveles bajosde inmunidad en los adultos cuando no se administraban dosis de recuerdo en la edad adulta. En España, en la encuesta de seroprevalencia de 1996, se apreciaba una menor seroprotección en las cohortes nacidas anteriormente a 1986. En 1995, el Consejo Interterritorial del Sistema Nacional de Salud, acordó incorporar la vacunación frente a difteria en los recuerdos realizados frente a tétanos con la vacuna Td en lugar de TT.”

Así que antes de despotricar contra los demás pónganse ustedes al día de sus propias vacunas. Si creen que reaparece la difteria en España asumid vuestra propia culpa por haber pasado 20, 30 o 40 años expuestos y exponiendo a los demás a la difteria como posibles portadores asintomáticos. A todos los efectos estáis sin vacunar, a lo mejor por eso estáis rabiosos.

Pero ojo que no todo son flores en los mundos de Yuppi de los vacuneros. El mismo folleto avisa:

(pág. 18) “Sin embargo, los recuerdos decenales han sido discutidos de forma creciente debido a los efectos secundarios que originan las dosis innecesarias.”

Sorpresa! los adultos se rebelan porque la vacuna les jode la vida. Los niños como no se expresan debe ser que les sienta de maravilla. La epidemia rampante de autismo nadie la sabe explicar y a nadie le interesa.

Talibanes vacuneros, es la hora de irse a tomar su propia medicina … sí, y por ahí también.

bacalao

Senior CDC Scientist Says Agency Forced Researchers To Lie About Safety Of Mercury Based Vaccines

by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

I am, now and have always been fiercely pro vaccine. I had all six of my children vaccinated. I believe that vaccines have saved the lives of hundreds of millions of humans over the past century and that broad vaccine coverage is critical to public health. But I want our vaccines to be as safe as possible. The new revelations in the following article support what I have been saying for eight years: Thimerosal is brain poison. When you vaccinate, always ask for Thimerosal-free vaccine, which are now available for virtually all vaccinations on the CDC schedule.

A senior CDC vaccine safety scientist, Dr. William Thompson, has invoked the protection of the Federal Whistleblower Statute following the release of his taped conversations disclosing pervasive corruption within CDC’s Vaccine Safety Division. Dr. Thompson, a sixteen year veteran and a senior scientist at CDC’s Immunology Safety Office is currently employed at CDC’s National Center for Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities. Thompson is an author of two of the three epidemiological studies on American population touted by CDC to “prove” the safety of Thimerosal against developmental disabilities. Thimerosal is a controversial mercury based vaccine preservative that research scientists and vaccine safety advocates have connected to the epidemic of brain disorders in children. The vaccine industry’s foremost spokesman and the world’s premier champion for Thimerosal in vaccines, Dr. Paul Offit, stated in 2008 that Dr. Thompson’s “wonderful” 2007 study was the “definitive” study on Thimerosal safety.

But Thompson now says that his bosses at CDC pressured him to alter the results of that study to conceal Thimerosal’s risks. Dr. Thompson says that his superiors at the CDC Developmental Disabilities Branch pressured him to manipulate the study’s findings and to bury the links between Thimerosal and brain damage.   In response to this pressure, the published version downplayed data showing that Thimerosal causes “Tics”, a family of grave neurological injuries – including Tourette’s Syndrome – that are associated with Autism. Thompson now says that the data showed a definitive statistically significant association between Thimerosal and tics. “Thimerosal from vaccines cause tics….I can say tics are four times more prevalent in kids with autism. There is biologic plausibility right now to say that Thimerosal causes autism-like features.” After burying these findings, CDC touted Thompson’s study to exculpate Thimerosal for use in current flu vaccine which is administered to pregnant women and young children. Thompson stated recently, in a taped interview with Simpson University biochemist Dr. Brian Hooker, “Do you think a pregnant mother would want to take a vaccine that they know caused tics? Absolutely not!! I would never give my wife a vaccine that I thought caused tics.”  http://vimeo.com/104141199

Thompson was also the co-author of a 2004 study in Pediatrics in which he now admits that, under pressure from CDC bosses, his team fraudulently withheld data demonstrating a significant link between the MMR vaccine and autism in African American boys. In a taped conversation, Thompson confessed, “I have great shame now when I meet families with kids with autism because I’ve – I’ve been part of the problem.”

In a written statement issued by Thompson’s attorney, Rick Morgan of Morgan Verkamp of Cincinnati, Ohio – a firm that specializes in Federal whistleblower cases – Thompson said: “I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the Journal Pediatrics. The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism. Decisions were made regarding which findings to report after the data were collected, and I believe that the final study protocol was not followed.”

Thompson described a pervasive culture of corruption at CDC’s Immunization Safety Office directed toward concealing statistical links between vaccines and brain injuries, particularly autism. “I have a boss who is asking me to lie. The higher ups wanted to do certain things and I went along with it. I was, in terms of chain in command, I was number four out of the five. Colleen [Boyle] was the Division Chief. Marshalyn [Yeargin-Allsopp] was a Branch Chief. Frank [DeStefano] was a Branch Chief at the time.”

Immediately after release of Thompson’s audio taped revelations, Dr. Frank DeStefano, now Chief of the Immunization Safety office, admitted in a September interview to CBS reporter, Sharyl Attkisson, that vaccines may indeed trigger autism in some vulnerable children. http://sharylattkisson.com/cdc-possibility-that-vaccines-rarely-trigger-autism/#audio

Thompson’s attorneys have handed over thousands of damning CDC documents to Congressman Bill Posey of Florida. Last week, Posey’s staff said that the Congressman is working with Committee Chairman, Lamar Smith, to schedule a hearing this spring on Thompson’s revelations before the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology. Posey hopes to subpoena Dr. Thompson, who is still employed by CDC; Thompson has promised that he intends to come clean about CDC.   “If forced to testify, I’m not going to lie. I basically have stopped lying.” http://vimeo.com/user5503203/review/106398908/44f9634e1b

Dr. Thompson told Dr. Hooker that “[CDC researchers] are not doing what they should be doing because they’re afraid to look for things that might be associated [with autism].” Thompson says that corruption is so rooted within the Immunization Safety Office that the only way to get to the truth now is for Congress to take the vaccine safety research away from CDC and give it to independent contractors who can create a transparent process. According to Thompson, the autism controversy has brought vaccine safety research to a halt. “CDC is….they’re paralyzed. The whole system is paralyzed right now and the whole branch is paralyzed and it’s becoming more paralyzed. So there is less and less being done, as the place just comes to a grinding halt.”

Thompson also stated that he feels angry at himself for having participated in CDC’s decade of deception to conceal the links Thimerosal and brain damage including autism. “I have great shame now when I meet a family with kids with autism, because I have been a part of the problem….Here’s what I shoulder. I shoulder that the CDC has put the research ten years behind. Because the CDC has not been transparent, we’ve missed ten years of research, because the CDC is so paralyzed right now by anything related to autism. They’re not doing what they should be doing. They are afraid to look for things that might be associated. There’s still a lot of shame with that….”

Thompson said that he is prepared for the personal consequences of coming clean; “So I have to deal with a few months of hell if this becomes public. No big deal. I’m not having to deal with a child who is suffering day in and day out. So that’s the way I view all of this. I’m completely ashamed of what I did.” http://vimeo.com/user5503203/review/106398908/44f9634e1b

Thompson described in chilling detail to Dr. Hooker, the intense pressure from his CDC bosses after he first broke ranks on vaccine safety. In 2004, he sent a letter to CDC Director, Julie Gerberding alerting her that CDC scientists were breaking research protocols to conceal the links between Thimerosal and brain damage in children. Gerberding never responded to Thompson’s allegations, but her deputy, Robert Chen, then head of CDC’s Immunization Safety Office and Thompson’s direct boss, confronted Thompson in an agency parking lot threatening him and screaming, “I would fire you if I could.” In 2009, Gerberding matriculated to Merck as Chief of the company’s Vaccine Division. Two years prior to the move, she approved Merck’s HPV vaccine for pre-adolescent girls – an estimated billion dollar value to the company. Following Thompson’s revelations, Merck transferred Gerberding from its Vaccine Division to Executive Vice President for Strategic Communications, Global Public Policy and Population Health.

CDC’s Immunization Safety Office is a troubled agency. In recent years a series of studies by Federal Investigators and Congressional committees, have issued scathing reports highlighting the dire conflicts of interest at CDC’s vaccine and research divisions.   A 2000 report by the Government Regulatory Reform Committee entitled “Conflicts of Interest in Vaccine Policy Making” identified a long inventory of corrupt financial ties between regulators and vaccine makers in FDA and CDC’s vaccine programs that are diverting the agency from its task of safeguarding public health. A 2007 US Senate investigation by Senator Tom Coburn, “CDC Off Center” found widespread corruption and mismanagement at CDC’s vaccine programs (Coburn, CDC Off Center, 2007). In 2008 an investigation by the Office of the Inspector General (IG) of HHS found that 97% of Special Government Advisors on committees in the CDC vaccine program failed to disclose necessary information about conflicts of interest (Levinson, 2008). Those findings prompted a series of criminal investigations. In March 2014 the US Office of Research Integrity (ORI), Director, David Wright, quit his job issuing a searing letter claiming pervasive scientific misconduct in biomedical research at CDC, the National Institute of Health (NIH) and the Public Health Service (PHS) all part of HHS which he characterized as “a remarkably dysfunctional bureaucracy.” (Wright, 2014) There is no evidence that CDC has moved to adopt the recommendations of these reports or to cure its problems in the vaccine division.

Despite the evidence, mainstream journalists refuse to report the myriad problems at CDC’s vaccine program.   Instead media outlets and journalists, almost without exception, dutifully parrot CDC’s assurances that all is well and censure vaccine safety advocates who urge the removal of Thimerosal from vaccines. The pharmaceutical industry spent $3.8 billion in direct marketing to TV, radio, newspapers and other direct marketing outlets in 2013 and an astonishing $5.4 billion in 2005. Some vaccine safety advocates have questioned whether that cash pipeline accounts, in part, for the mainstream media’s blackout affecting discussions of Thimerosal safety.

Thompson is not the first scientist to complain about pressure from his bosses at CDC’s Immunization Safety Office. In 2001, CDC researcher, Thomas Verstraeten, made similar allegations. Verstraeten was the co-author of the first of three studies offered by CDC to exculpate Thimerosal from developmental disorders. (Verstraeten et al. 2003 Pediatrics 112:1039) Verstraeten’s initial analysis showed correlations between Thimerosal and autism – and a host of other neurological disorders – comparable to the causal relationship between cigarettes and lung cancer. Over the next three years, a team of CDC researchers produced five consecutive versions of the report; each one eliminating more people and watering down the Thimerosal/brain damage relationship. Finally Verstraeten complained on July 14, 2000 in an email to toxicologist, Phillipe Grandjean, a CDC consultant, “I do not wish to be the advocate of the anti-vaccine lobby…..but at least I feel we should use sound scientific argumentation and not let our standards be dictated by our desire to disprove an unpleasant theory” www.putchildrenfirst.org /media/2.20.pitl. When CDC tried to present the watered down version of the study as proof of Thimerosal’s safety, Thompson wrote a strong rebuke to CDC scolding the agency for misrepresenting the study as an exculpation of the Thimersoal autism link. http://www.safeminds.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Dr.-Verstraeten-emails-to-Dr.-Grandjean-a-mercury-expert-1.pdf. See also: http://www.safeminds.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/CDC-knew-study-design-lacked-power-to-detect-adverse-associations.pdf

The CDC came under similar fire for its controversial study of Thimerosal’s links with autism ambiguous in Denmark. The authors have acknowledged that the so called “Madsen Study” employed deceptive data to make it wrongly appear that autism rates increased after the Danes removed Thimerosal from vaccines in 1993.   Poul Thorsen the study’s principle investigator and CDC’s primary contact, was fired from his post at Andhaus University and is now on the run from Interpol, having stolen at least a million dollars in research monies from CDC.  A subsequent study by CDC published in JAMA in 2013 has shown that autism rates dropped in Denmark every year for ten consecutive years after Thimerosal’s removal from vaccines (Grenborg et al. JAMA Pediatrics 2013).

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. is an author, environmental activist, and attorney specializing in environmental law. Follow him on Twitter @RobertKenedyJr.

Обращение студентов РФ в ответ на обращение студентов Украины – Кто же они?

Кто же те “студенты” которые ответили обвиняя Россию?‏

Для тех которые смотря на этот видео верили в том, что это записали представители российских студентов. Студенты ли они? или политические активисты? Что такое движение Весна? https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%B0_%28%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B4%D1%91%D0%B6%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B5_%D0%B4%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5%29 Это бывшее «Молодежное Яблоко» (Young Yabloko)


Кто такой Антон Горбацевич на видео? Активисты нового молодежного движения «Весна» – о том, что плохого сделал им Путин Какая у них цель? http://www.utro.ru/articles/2014/03/21/1183766.shtml Кто их спонсор (Young Yabloko)? http://www.ned.org/publications/annual-reports/2007-annual-report/eurasia/description-of-2007-grants/russia National Endowment for Democracy 1025 F Street NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20004 / (202) 378-9700 Это групировка предателев, которые числятся в платежной ведомости США!