Vacuna contra el VPH: una esterilización masiva y subrepticia.

Una simple búsqueda en PUBMED revela que se ya desde 1977 se han estado estudiando maneras de crear un vacuna anticonceptiva. Su funcionamiento consistiría en inducir anticuerpos de larga duración que atacasen ciertos órganos reproductivos femeninos.

Por ejemplo:

Contraceptive vaccines – PUBMED

“…To date, three major targets have been researched. The zona pellucida (ZP) plays key roles in folliculogenesis, fertilisation and early development, and is comprised of powerful cell-specific antigens. The induction of infertility requires high ZP antibody titres that are difficult to maintain without inducing ovarian pathology characterised by a premature loss of primordial follicles…”

Es decir, una vacuna para producir infertilidad atacaría con anticuerpos de larga duración la zona pellucida.

Pues fijaos qué casualidad…

Premature ovarian failure 3 years after menarche in a 16-year-old girl following human papillomavirus vaccination

“Premature ovarian failure was then notified as a possible adverse event following this vaccination….This event could hold potential implications for population health and prompts further inquiry…”

Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine and Primary Ovarian Failure: Another Facet of the Autoimmune/Inflammatory Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants.CiteNPL

“METHOD OF STUDY: The medical history of three young women who presented with secondary amenorrhea following HPV vaccination was collected. Data regarding type of vaccine, number of vaccination, personal, clinical and serological features, as well as response to treatments were analyzed.

RESULTS: All three patients developed secondary amenorrhea following HPV vaccinations, which did not resolve upon treatment with hormone replacement therapies.”

Con las vacunas las “casualidades” son tan frecuentes que ya son la norma.

También es pura “casualidad” que las personas que toman las decisiones en el tema de la vacuna del VPH sean también expertos en la biología molecular de la zona pellucida, precisamente la que se atacaría con anticuerpos mediante una vacuna anticonceptiva:

Speakers – Preventing Cervical Cancer: Integrating Screening and Vaccination

“Dr. Castle did a post-doctoral fellowship at the NIH on the molecular biology of the zona pellucida from 1995-1999, and was a Cancer Prevention Fellow at NCI from 2000-2003.”

“Dr. Castle’s professional interests are (1) epidemiology of human papillomaviruses (HPV) and cervical/anogenital cancer; (2) science and translation of cancer prevention strategies … he serves a consultant for several countries on the development of national cervical cancer prevention programs.”

¿Estamos ante una vacuna anticonceptiva subrepticia? Con estos datos sería difícil no sospecharlo. El hecho de que la vacuna del VPH se quiera imponer a todas las mujeres justo al comienzo de sus edad fértil (12 – 13 años) parece obedecer a una agenda eugenésica. Se trataría de un ataque con anticuerpos contra la zona pellucida para inducir infertilidad permanente en las niñas.
__________________

8 pensamientos en “Vacuna contra el VPH: una esterilización masiva y subrepticia.

  1. Lack of effects on fertility and developmental toxicity of a quadrivalent HPV vaccine in Sprague-Dawley rats.
    “There were no effects on the fertility or reproductive performance of the F0 females.”
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19025783

    Lack of effects on male fertility from a quadrivalent HPV vaccine in Sprague-Dawley rats.
    “These results demonstrate that this quadrivalent HPV vaccine had no detectable adverse effects on routine measures of male fertility in rats.”
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20836123

    Evaluation of the intramuscular administration of Cervarix™ vaccine on fertility, pre- and post-natal development in rats.
    “Treatment of rats with vaccine or AS04 was not associated with any systemic toxicity and had no impact on female fertility”
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20851759

    Overview of the clinical development and results of a quadrivalent HPV (types 6, 11, 16, 18) vaccine
    “At the time of licensure, a total of 2266 subjects became pregnant during clinical trials (vaccine
    = 1115, placebo = 1151), even though subjects were instructed to use contraception during the vaccination phase of the study. Of these pregnancies, the percentage of subjects experiencing an adverse outcome was comparable in the vaccine or placebo groups.”
    http://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(07)60017-4/abstract

    • Veamos quien paga los “estudios” que me traes:

      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19025783

      Sponsor: Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486, USA. ld_wise@merck.com

      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19025783

      Sponsor: Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486, USA. ld_wise@merck.com

      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20851759

      Sponsor: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Rue de l’Institut 89, 1330 Rixensart, Belgium. Lawrence.segal@gskbio.com

      Son los propios fabricantes de esta mierda alabando a sus productos. El conflicto de intereses es obvio.

      Para mas insulto a la inteligencia, se trata de estudios sobre ratas, no humanos, y además ratas macho. Totalmente irrelevantes porque la zona pellucida del ovocito solo existe en las hembras, lógicamente, y es la zona que se encontraría bajo ataque del propio sistema inmunitario.

      Este es el estudio que te conviene leer:

      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20851759

      WARNING: This review includes 15 out of 36 trials funded by industry (four had no funding declaration). An earlier systematic review of 274 influenza vaccine studies published up to 2007 found industry funded studies were published in more prestigious journals and cited more than other studies independently from methodological quality and size. Studies funded from public sources were significantly less likely to report conclusions favorable to the vaccines. The review showed that reliable evidence on influenza vaccines is thin but there is evidence of widespread manipulation of conclusions and spurious notoriety of the studies.

    • Me has traido evidencia de un conflicto de intereses, nada mas.

      Yo te he respondido con un estudio independiente de Cochrane Colaboration que demuestra la magnitud del problema de manipulación de los estudios sobre vacunas por parte de los fabricantes.

      Y tu te haces el tonto y te sorprendes… o de verdad eres así.

      Pero ya que te gustan los estudios dobre ratones, aqui tienes un ejemplo de vacuna viral que causa infertilidad permanente en los roedores precisamente atacando con anticuerpos la zona pellucida:

      Immunization with recombinant murine cytomegalovirus expressing murine zona pellucida 3 causes permanent infertility in BALB/c mice due to follicle depletion and ovulation failure.

      “…Zona pellucida (ZP) glycoproteins are promising candidate antigens for use in immunocontraceptive vaccines because of their crucial role in mammalian fertilization…A single intraperitoneal immunization with recombinant murine cytomegalovirus engineered to express murine ZP3 (rMCMV-mZP3) induces permanent infertility with no evident systemic illness in female BALB/c mice…”

      Es perfectamente factible y la vacuna del VPH está poniendo en práctica esta técnica ya.

  2. Estudio controlado sobre la vacuna Cervarix contra el VPH demostró una tasa de abortos espontáneos dos veces mayor en el grupo vacunado respecto al grupo de control:

    Risk of miscarriage with bivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16 and 18: pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials.

    OBJECTIVE: To assess whether vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) increases the risk of miscarriage.

    RESULTS: The estimated rate of miscarriage was 11.5% in pregnancies in women in the HPV arm and 10.2% in the control arm. The one sided P value for the primary analysis was 0.16; thus, overall, there was no significant increase in miscarriage among women assigned to the HPV vaccine arm. In secondary descriptive analyses, miscarriage rates were 14.7% in the HPV vaccine arm and 9.1% in the control arm in pregnancies that began within three months after nearest vaccination.

    Lo as cínico es la conclusión:

    CONCLUSION: There is no evidence overall for an association between HPV vaccination and risk of miscarriage.

    Negacionismo y sesgo en estado puro!

Responder

Introduce tus datos o haz clic en un icono para iniciar sesión:

Logo de WordPress.com

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de WordPress.com. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Imagen de Twitter

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Twitter. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Foto de Facebook

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Facebook. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Google+ photo

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Google+. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Conectando a %s